Pular a barra do clicRBS e ir direto para o cabeçalho.
clicRBS
Nova busca - outros

Os supersoldados Seal libertaram reféns na Somália

25 de janeiro de 2012 0

A operação espetacular (veja aqui) que culminou na libertação da americana Jessica Buchanan, 32 anos, e do dinamarquês Poul Thisted, 60 anos, foi realizada pelo Seal. O comando é composto por militares altamente especializados (como supersoldados), treinados por dois anos além do normal para fuzileiros navais e mantidos por um orçamento de US$ 1 bilhão por ano.

O nome é inspirado no tipo de atuação: são capazes de realizar operações no mar ("sea", em inglês), no ar ("air") e na terra ("land"). Estima-se que existam hoje 2,5 mil soldados Seal em atividade. Eles não existem oficialmente.

O Seal Team 6, que atuou na operação que matou Osama bin Laden e na libertação dos reféns ontem, é um grupo dentro dos Seal escolhido pelo comando da marinha para realizar as missões mais difíceis, normalmente em parceria com a CIA, a agência de inteligência do governo americano. São a elite da elite.

A Somália é um dos países mais perigosos do mundo. Não há poder centralizado, e grande parte do território é ocupado por extremistas islâmicos. As ações dos piratas somalis se tornaram mais frequentes nos últimos anos. Os criminosos costumam tomar de assalto embarcações no Oceano Índico em troca de um resgate -  principalmente navios mercantes que transitam pela costa africana. Nos últimos meses, o sequestro de ocidentais por grupos armados, como no caso do casal de voluntários, aumentou no país.    

Share

Obama tenta capitalizar principal vitória de seu governo: matar Bin Laden

25 de janeiro de 2012 0

Durante quase uma hora, o presidente Barack Obama listou os principais feitos de seu governo e lançou a bandeira de sua candidatura à reeleição. Ele começou e terminou o pronunciamento diante do Congresso capitalizando o principal triunfo de seus quatro anos: matar Osama bin Laden. No início, disse que pela primeira vez os EUA não estão sob a ameaça do líder da Al-Qaeda e encerrou lembrando a bandeira do SEAL, unidade que eliminou o terrorista no Paquistão. Iniciou o discurso falando do ponto de vista militar e o encerrou assim, comemorando também o retorno das tropas americanas do Iraque.

Mas os assuntos foram variados: na área econômica, que era sua tônica, prometeu mais empregos e inovação tecnológica. Na área de energia, defendeu o uso de energia eólica e solar, em detrimento do petróleo. Reforçou a aliança militar com Israel e, diante da Primavera Árabe e das revoltas no Oriente Médio, previu, sem citar explicitamente, a queda do regime de Bashar al-Assad na Síria.

O discurso foi um tanto populista, focado em agradar a classe média, o eleitor que irá decidir a eleição de novembro. Citou cases, pessoas convidadas para, estrategicamente, estarem ali, ilustrando seu discurso, como a secretária do milionário Warren Buffet, que paga mais impostos do que o patrão. Aliás, corte de impostos também foi um dos temas enfatizados por seu discurso - em oposição franca aos pré-candidatos republicanos.

Mais uma vez ficou clara a capacidade retórica de Obama. É impressionante a dramaticidade que dá às palavras, ele sabe exatamente onde são as pausas e, mesmo lendo o teleprompter, o presidente tem um domínio impressionante de sua oratória.

Share

A íntegra do discurso de Obama (em inglês)

25 de janeiro de 2012 0

State of the Union Address

“An America Built to Last”

Tuesday, January 24th, 2012

Washington, DC

Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, members of Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow Americans:

Last month, I went to Andrews Air Force Base and welcomed home some of our last troops to serve in Iraq.  Together, we offered a final, proud salute to the colors under which more than a million of our fellow citizens fought – and several thousand gave their lives.

We gather tonight knowing that this generation of heroes has made the United States safer and more respected around the world.  For the first time in nine years, there are no Americans fighting in Iraq.  For the first time in two decades, Osama bin Laden is not a threat to this country.  Most of al Qaeda’s top lieutenants have been defeated.  The Taliban’s momentum has been broken, and some troops in Afghanistan have begun to come home.

These achievements are a testament to the courage, selflessness, and teamwork of America’s Armed Forces.  At a time when too many of our institutions have let us down, they exceed all expectations.  They’re not consumed with personal ambition.  They don’t obsess over their differences.  They focus on the mission at hand.  They work together.

Imagine what we could accomplish if we followed their example.  Think about the America within our reach:  A country that leads the world in educating its people.  An America that attracts a new generation of high-tech manufacturing and high-paying jobs.  A future where we’re in control of our own energy, and our security and prosperity aren’t so tied to unstable parts of the world.  An economy built to last, where hard work pays off, and responsibility is rewarded.

We can do this.  I know we can, because we’ve done it before.  At the end of World War II, when another generation of heroes returned home from combat, they built the strongest economy and middle class the world has ever known.  My grandfather, a veteran of Patton’s Army, got the chance to go to college on the GI Bill.  My grandmother, who worked on a bomber assembly line, was part of a workforce that turned out the best products on Earth.

The two of them shared the optimism of a Nation that had triumphed over a depression and fascism.  They understood they were part of something larger; that they were contributing to a story of success that every American had a chance to share – the basic American promise that if you worked hard, you could do well enough to raise a family, own a home, send your kids to college, and put a little away for retirement.

The defining issue of our time is how to keep that promise alive.  No challenge is more urgent.  No debate is more important.  We can either settle for a country where a shrinking number of people do really well, while a growing number of Americans barely get by.  Or we can restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same set of rules.  What’s at stake are not Democratic values or Republican values, but American values.  We have to reclaim them.

Let’s remember how we got here.  Long before the recession, jobs and manufacturing began leaving our shores.   Technology made businesses more efficient, but also made some jobs obsolete.  Folks at the top saw their incomes rise like never before, but most hardworking Americans struggled with costs that were growing, paychecks that weren’t, and personal debt that kept piling up.

In 2008, the house of cards collapsed.  We learned that mortgages had been sold to people who couldn’t afford or understand them.  Banks had made huge bets and bonuses with other people’s money.  Regulators had looked the other way, or didn’t have the authority to stop the bad behavior.

It was wrong.  It was irresponsible.  And it plunged our economy into a crisis that put millions out of work, saddled us with more debt, and left innocent, hard-working Americans holding the bag.  In the six months before I took office, we lost nearly four million jobs.  And we lost another four million before our policies were in full effect.

Those are the facts.  But so are these.  In the last 22 months, businesses have created more than three million jobs.  Last year, they created the most jobs since 2005.  American manufacturers are hiring again, creating jobs for the first time since the late 1990s.  Together, we’ve agreed to cut the deficit by more than $2 trillion.  And we’ve put in place new rules to hold Wall Street accountable, so a crisis like that never happens again.

The state of our Union is getting stronger.  And we’ve come too far to turn back now.  As long as I’m President, I will work with anyone in this chamber to build on this momentum.  But I intend to fight obstruction with action, and I will oppose any effort to return to the very same policies that brought on this economic crisis in the first place.

No, we will not go back to an economy weakened by outsourcing, bad debt, and phony financial profits.  Tonight, I want to speak about how we move forward, and lay out a blueprint for an economy that’s built to last – an economy built on American manufacturing, American energy, skills for American workers, and a renewal of American values.

This blueprint begins with American manufacturing.

On the day I took office, our auto industry was on the verge of collapse.  Some even said we should let it die.  With a million jobs at stake, I refused to let that happen.  In exchange for help, we demanded responsibility.  We got workers and automakers to settle their differences.  We got the industry to retool and restructure.  Today, General Motors is back on top as the world’s number one automaker.  Chrysler has grown faster in the U.S. than any major car company.  Ford is investing billions in U.S. plants and factories.  And together, the entire industry added nearly 160,000 jobs.

We bet on American workers.  We bet on American ingenuity.  And tonight, the American auto industry is back.

What’s happening in Detroit can happen in other industries.  It can happen in Cleveland and Pittsburgh and Raleigh.  We can’t bring back every job that’s left our shores.  But right now, it’s getting more expensive to do business in places like China.  Meanwhile, America is more productive.  A few weeks ago, the CEO of Master Lock told me that it now makes business sense for him to bring jobs back home.  Today, for the first time in fifteen years, Master Lock’s unionized plant in Milwaukee is running at full capacity.

So we have a huge opportunity, at this moment, to bring manufacturing back.  But we have to seize it.  Tonight, my message to business leaders is simple:  Ask yourselves what you can do to bring jobs back to your country, and your country will do everything we can to help you succeed.

We should start with our tax code.  Right now, companies get tax breaks for moving jobs and profits overseas.  Meanwhile, companies that choose to stay in America get hit with one of the highest tax rates in the world.  It makes no sense, and everyone knows it.

So let’s change it.  First, if you’re a business that wants to outsource jobs, you shouldn’t get a tax deduction for doing it.  That money should be used to cover moving expenses for companies like Master Lock that decide to bring jobs home.

Second, no American company should be able to avoid paying its fair share of taxes by moving jobs and profits overseas.  From now on, every multinational company should have to pay a basic minimum tax.  And every penny should go towards lowering taxes for companies that choose to stay here and hire here.

Third, if you’re an American manufacturer, you should get a bigger tax cut.  If you’re a high-tech manufacturer, we should double the tax deduction you get for making products here.  And if you want to relocate in a community that was hit hard when a factory left town, you should get help financing a new plant, equipment, or training for new workers.

My message is simple.  It’s time to stop rewarding businesses that ship jobs overseas, and start rewarding companies that create jobs right here in America.  Send me these tax reforms, and I’ll sign them right away.

We’re also making it easier for American businesses to sell products all over the world.  Two years ago, I set a goal of doubling U.S. exports over five years.  With the bipartisan trade agreements I signed into law, we are on track to meet that goal – ahead of schedule.  Soon, there will be millions of new customers for American goods in Panama, Colombia, and South Korea.  Soon, there will be new cars on the streets of Seoul imported from Detroit, and Toledo, and Chicago.

I will go anywhere in the world to open new markets for American products.  And I will not stand by when our competitors don’t play by the rules.  We’ve brought trade cases against China at nearly twice the rate as the last administration – and it’s made a difference.  Over a thousand Americans are working today because we stopped a surge in Chinese tires.  But we need to do more.  It’s not right when another country lets our movies, music, and software be pirated.  It’s not fair when foreign manufacturers have a leg up on ours only because they’re heavily subsidized.

Tonight, I’m announcing the creation of a Trade Enforcement Unit that will be charged with investigating unfair trade practices in countries like China.  There will be more inspections to prevent counterfeit or unsafe goods from crossing our borders.  And this Congress should make sure that no foreign company has an advantage over American manufacturing when it comes to accessing finance or new markets like Russia.  Our workers are the most productive on Earth, and if the playing field is level, I promise you – America will always win.

I also hear from many business leaders who want to hire in the United States but can’t find workers with the right skills.  Growing industries in science and technology have twice as many openings as we have workers who can do the job.  Think about that – openings at a time when millions of Americans are looking for work.

That’s inexcusable.  And we know how to fix it.

Jackie Bray is a single mom from North Carolina who was laid off from her job as a mechanic.  Then Siemens opened a gas turbine factory in Charlotte, and formed a partnership with Central Piedmont Community College.  The company helped the college design courses in laser and robotics training.  It paid Jackie’s tuition, then hired her to help operate their plant.

I want every American looking for work to have the same opportunity as Jackie did.  Join me in a national commitment to train two million Americans with skills that will lead directly to a job.  My Administration has already lined up more companies that want to help.  Model partnerships between businesses like Siemens and community colleges in places like Charlotte, Orlando, and Louisville are up and running.   Now you need to give more community colleges the resources they need to become community career centers – places that teach people skills that local businesses are looking for right now, from data management to high-tech manufacturing.

And I want to cut through the maze of confusing training programs, so that from now on, people like Jackie have one program, one website, and one place to go for all the information and help they need.  It’s time to turn our unemployment system into a reemployment system that puts people to work.

These reforms will help people get jobs that are open today.  But to prepare for the jobs of tomorrow, our commitment to skills and education has to start earlier.

For less than one percent of what our Nation spends on education each year, we’ve convinced nearly every State in the country to raise their standards for teaching and learning – the first time that’s happened in a generation.

But challenges remain.  And we know how to solve them.

At a time when other countries are doubling down on education, tight budgets have forced States to lay off thousands of teachers.  We know a good teacher can increase the lifetime income of a classroom by over $250,000.  A great teacher can offer an escape from poverty to the child who dreams beyond his circumstance.   Every person in this chamber can point to a teacher who changed the trajectory of their lives.  Most teachers work tirelessly, with modest pay, sometimes digging into their own pocket for school supplies – just to make a difference.

Teachers matter.  So instead of bashing them, or defending the status quo, let’s offer schools a deal.  Give them the resources to keep good teachers on the job, and reward the best ones.  In return, grant schools flexibility:  To teach with creativity and passion; to stop teaching to the test; and to replace teachers who just aren’t helping kids learn.

We also know that when students aren’t allowed to walk away from their education, more of them walk the stage to get their diploma.  So tonight, I call on every State to require that all students stay in high school until they graduate or turn eighteen.

When kids do graduate, the most daunting challenge can be the cost of college.  At a time when Americans owe more in tuition debt than credit card debt, this Congress needs to stop the interest rates on student loans from doubling in July.  Extend the tuition tax credit we started that saves middle-class families thousands of dollars.  And give more young people the chance to earn their way through college by doubling the number of work-study jobs in the next five years.

Of course, it’s not enough for us to increase student aid.  We can’t just keep subsidizing skyrocketing tuition; we’ll run out of money.  States also need to do their part, by making higher education a higher priority in their budgets.  And colleges and universities have to do their part by working to keep costs down.  Recently, I spoke with a group of college presidents who’ve done just that.  Some schools re-design courses to help students finish more quickly.  Some use better technology.  The point is, it’s possible.  So let me put colleges and universities on notice:  If you can’t stop tuition from going up, the funding you get from taxpayers will go down.  Higher education can’t be a luxury – it’s an economic imperative that every family in America should be able to afford.

Let’s also remember that hundreds of thousands of talented, hardworking students in this country face another challenge:  The fact that they aren’t yet American citizens.  Many were brought here as small children, are American through and through, yet they live every day with the threat of deportation.  Others came more recently, to study business and science and engineering, but as soon as they get their degree, we send them home to invent new products and create new jobs somewhere else.

That doesn’t make sense.

I believe as strongly as ever that we should take on illegal immigration. That’s why my Administration has put more boots on the border than ever before.  That’s why there are fewer illegal crossings than when I took office.

The opponents of action are out of excuses.  We should be working on comprehensive immigration reform right now.   But if election-year politics keeps Congress from acting on a comprehensive plan, let’s at least agree to stop expelling responsible young people who want to staff our labs, start new businesses, and defend this country.  Send me a law that gives them the chance to earn their citizenship.  I will sign it right away.

You see, an economy built to last is one where we encourage the talent and ingenuity of every person in this country.  That means women should earn equal pay for equal work.  It means we should support everyone who’s willing to work; and every risk-taker and entrepreneur who aspires to become the next Steve Jobs.

After all, innovation is what America has always been about.  Most new jobs are created in start-ups and small businesses.  So let’s pass an agenda that helps them succeed.  Tear down regulations that prevent aspiring entrepreneurs from getting the financing to grow.  Expand tax relief to small businesses that are raising wages and creating good jobs.  Both parties agree on these ideas.  So put them in a bill, and get it on my desk this year.

Innovation also demands basic research.  Today, the discoveries taking place in our federally-financed labs and universities could lead to new treatments that kill cancer cells but leave healthy ones untouched.  New lightweight vests for cops and soldiers that can stop any bullet.  Don’t gut these investments in our budget.  Don’t let other countries win the race for the future.  Support the same kind of research and innovation that led to the computer chip and the Internet; to new American jobs and new American industries.

Nowhere is the promise of innovation greater than in American-made energy.  Over the last three years, we’ve opened millions of new acres for oil and gas exploration, and tonight, I’m directing my Administration to open more than 75 percent of our potential offshore oil and gas resources.  Right now, American oil production is the highest that it’s been in eight years.  That’s right – eight years.  Not only that – last year, we relied less on foreign oil than in any of the past sixteen years.

But with only 2 percent of the world’s oil reserves, oil isn’t enough.  This country needs an all-out, all-of-the-above strategy that develops every available source of American energy – a strategy that’s cleaner, cheaper, and full of new jobs.

We have a supply of natural gas that can last America nearly one hundred years, and my Administration will take every possible action to safely develop this energy.  Experts believe this will support more than 600,000 jobs by the end of the decade.  And I’m requiring all companies that drill for gas on public lands to disclose the chemicals they use.  America will develop this resource without putting the health and safety of our citizens at risk.

The development of natural gas will create jobs and power trucks and factories that are cleaner and cheaper, proving that we don’t have to choose between our environment and our economy.  And by the way, it was public research dollars, over the course of thirty years, that helped develop the technologies to extract all this natural gas out of shale rock – reminding us that Government support is critical in helping businesses get new energy ideas off the ground.

What’s true for natural gas is true for clean energy.  In three years, our partnership with the private sector has already positioned America to be the world’s leading manufacturer of high-tech batteries.  Because of federal investments, renewable energy use has nearly doubled.  And thousands of Americans have jobs because of it.

When Bryan Ritterby was laid off from his job making furniture, he said he worried that at 55, no one would give him a second chance.  But he found work at Energetx, a wind turbine manufacturer in Michigan.  Before the recession, the factory only made luxury yachts.  Today, it’s hiring workers like Bryan, who said, “I’m proud to be working in the industry of the future.”

Our experience with shale gas shows us that the payoffs on these public investments don’t always come right away.  Some technologies don’t pan out; some companies fail.  But I will not walk away from the promise of clean energy.  I will not walk away from workers like Bryan.  I will not cede the wind or solar or battery industry to China or Germany because we refuse to make the same commitment here.  We have subsidized oil companies for a century.  That’s long enough.  It’s time to end the taxpayer giveaways to an industry that’s rarely been more profitable, and double-down on a clean energy industry that’s never been more promising.   Pass clean energy tax credits and create these jobs.

We can also spur energy innovation with new incentives.  The differences in this chamber may be too deep right now to pass a comprehensive plan to fight climate change.  But there’s no reason why Congress shouldn’t at least set a clean energy standard that creates a market for innovation.  So far, you haven’t acted.  Well tonight, I will.  I’m directing my Administration to allow the development of clean energy on enough public land to power three million homes.  And I’m proud to announce that the Department of Defense, the world’s largest consumer of energy, will make one of the largest commitments to clean energy in history – with the Navy purchasing enough capacity to power a quarter of a million homes a year.

Of course, the easiest way to save money is to waste less energy.  So here’s another proposal:  Help manufacturers eliminate energy waste in their factories and give businesses incentives to upgrade their buildings.  Their energy bills will be $100 billion lower over the next decade, and America will have less pollution, more manufacturing, and more jobs for construction workers who need them.  Send me a bill that creates these jobs.

Building this new energy future should be just one part of a broader agenda to repair America’s infrastructure.  So much of America needs to be rebuilt.  We’ve got crumbling roads and bridges.  A power grid that wastes too much energy.  An incomplete high-speed broadband network that prevents a small business owner in rural America from selling her products all over the world.

During the Great Depression, America built the Hoover Dam and the Golden Gate Bridge.  After World War II, we connected our States with a system of highways.  Democratic and Republican administrations invested in great projects that benefited everybody, from the workers who built them to the businesses that still use them today.

In the next few weeks, I will sign an Executive Order clearing away the red tape that slows down too many construction projects.  But you need to fund these projects.  Take the money we’re no longer spending at war, use half of it to pay down our debt, and use the rest to do some nation-building right here at home.

There’s never been a better time to build, especially since the construction industry was one of the hardest-hit when the housing bubble burst.  Of course, construction workers weren’t the only ones hurt.  So were millions of innocent Americans who’ve seen their home values decline.  And while Government can’t fix the problem on its own, responsible homeowners shouldn’t have to sit and wait for the housing market to hit bottom to get some relief.

That’s why I’m sending this Congress a plan that gives every responsible homeowner the chance to save about $3,000 a year on their mortgage, by refinancing at historically low interest rates.  No more red tape.  No more runaround from the banks.  A small fee on the largest financial institutions will ensure that it won’t add to the deficit, and will give banks that were rescued by taxpayers a chance to repay a deficit of trust.

Let’s never forget:  Millions of Americans who work hard and play by the rules every day deserve a Government and a financial system that do the same.  It’s time to apply the same rules from top to bottom:  No bailouts, no handouts, and no copouts.  An America built to last insists on responsibility from everybody.

We’ve all paid the price for lenders who sold mortgages to people who couldn’t afford them, and buyers who knew they couldn’t afford them.  That’s why we need smart regulations to prevent irresponsible behavior.  Rules to prevent financial fraud, or toxic dumping, or faulty medical devices, don’t destroy the free market.  They make the free market work better.

There is no question that some regulations are outdated, unnecessary, or too costly.  In fact, I’ve approved fewer regulations in the first three years of my presidency than my Republican predecessor did in his.  I’ve ordered every federal agency to eliminate rules that don’t make sense.  We’ve already announced over 500 reforms, and just a fraction of them will save business and citizens more than $10 billion over the next five years.  We got rid of one rule from 40 years ago that could have forced some dairy farmers to spend $10,000 a year proving that they could contain a spill – because milk was somehow classified as an oil.  With a rule like that, I guess it was worth crying over spilled milk.

I’m confident a farmer can contain a milk spill without a federal agency looking over his shoulder.  But I will not back down from making sure an oil company can contain the kind of oil spill we saw in the Gulf two years ago.  I will not back down from protecting our kids from mercury pollution, or making sure that our food is safe and our water is clean.  I will not go back to the days when health insurance companies had unchecked power to cancel your policy, deny you coverage, or charge women differently from men.

And I will not go back to the days when Wall Street was allowed to play by its own set of rules.  The new rules we passed restore what should be any financial system’s core purpose:  Getting funding to entrepreneurs with the best ideas, and getting loans to responsible families who want to buy a home, start a business, or send a kid to college.

So if you’re a big bank or financial institution, you are no longer allowed to make risky bets with your customers’ deposits.  You’re required to write out a “living will” that details exactly how you’ll pay the bills if you fail – because the rest of us aren’t bailing you out ever again.  And if you’re a mortgage lender or a payday lender or a credit card company, the days of signing people up for products they can’t afford with confusing forms and deceptive practices are over.  Today, American consumers finally have a watchdog in Richard Cordray with one job: To look out for them.

We will also establish a Financial Crimes Unit of highly trained investigators to crack down on large-scale fraud and protect people’s investments.  Some financial firms violate major anti-fraud laws because there’s no real penalty for being a repeat offender.  That’s bad for consumers, and it’s bad for the vast majority of bankers and financial service professionals who do the right thing.  So pass legislation that makes the penalties for fraud count.

And tonight, I am asking my Attorney General to create a special unit of federal prosecutors and leading state attorneys general to expand our investigations into the abusive lending and packaging of risky mortgages that led to the housing crisis. This new unit will hold accountable those who broke the law, speed assistance to homeowners, and help turn the page on an era of recklessness that hurt so many Americans.

A return to the American values of fair play and shared responsibility will help us protect our people and our economy.  But it should also guide us as we look to pay down our debt and invest in our future.

Right now, our most immediate priority is stopping a tax hike on 160 million working Americans while the recovery is still fragile.  People cannot afford losing $40 out of each paycheck this year.  There are plenty of ways to get this done.  So let’s agree right here, right now:  No side issues.  No drama.  Pass the payroll tax cut without delay.

When it comes to the deficit, we’ve already agreed to more than $2 trillion in cuts and savings.  But we need to do more, and that means making choices.  Right now, we’re poised to spend nearly $1 trillion more on what was supposed to be a temporary tax break for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans.  Right now, because of loopholes and shelters in the tax code, a quarter of all millionaires pay lower tax rates than millions of middle-class households.  Right now, Warren Buffett pays a lower tax rate than his secretary.

Do we want to keep these tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans?  Or do we want to keep our investments in everything else – like education and medical research; a strong military and care for our veterans?  Because if we’re serious about paying down our debt, we can’t do both.

The American people know what the right choice is.  So do I.  As I told the Speaker this summer, I’m prepared to make more reforms that rein in the long term costs of Medicare and Medicaid, and strengthen Social Security, so long as those programs remain a guarantee of security for seniors.

But in return, we need to change our tax code so that people like me, and an awful lot of Members of Congress, pay our fair share of taxes.  Tax reform should follow the Buffett rule:  If you make more than $1 million a year, you should not pay less than 30 percent in taxes.  And my Republican friend Tom Coburn is right:  Washington should stop subsidizing millionaires.  In fact, if you’re earning a million dollars a year, you shouldn’t get special tax subsidies or deductions.  On the other hand, if you make under $250,000 a year, like 98 percent of American families, your taxes shouldn’t go up.  You’re the ones struggling with rising costs and stagnant wages.  You’re the ones who need relief.

Now, you can call this class warfare all you want.  But asking a billionaire to pay at least as much as his secretary in taxes?  Most Americans would call that common sense.

We don’t begrudge financial success in this country.  We admire it.  When Americans talk about folks like me paying my fair share of taxes, it’s not because they envy the rich.  It’s because they understand that when I get tax breaks I don’t need and the country can’t afford, it either adds to the deficit, or somebody else has to make up the difference – like a senior on a fixed income; or a student trying to get through school; or a family trying to make ends meet.  That’s not right.  Americans know it’s not right.  They know that this generation’s success is only possible because past generations felt a responsibility to each other, and to their country’s future, and they know our way of life will only endure if we feel that same sense of shared responsibility.  That’s how we’ll reduce our deficit.  That’s an America built to last.

I recognize that people watching tonight have differing views about taxes and debt; energy and health care.  But no matter what party they belong to, I bet most Americans are thinking the same thing right now:  Nothing will get done this year, or next year, or maybe even the year after that, because Washington is broken.

Can you blame them for feeling a little cynical?

The greatest blow to confidence in our economy last year didn’t come from events beyond our control.  It came from a debate in Washington over whether the United States would pay its bills or not.  Who benefited from that fiasco?

I’ve talked tonight about the deficit of trust between Main Street and Wall Street.  But the divide between this city and the rest of the country is at least as bad – and it seems to get worse every year.

Some of this has to do with the corrosive influence of money in politics.  So together, let’s take some steps to fix that.  Send me a bill that bans insider trading by Members of Congress, and I will sign it tomorrow.  Let’s limit any elected official from owning stocks in industries they impact.  Let’s make sure people who bundle campaign contributions for Congress can’t lobby Congress, and vice versa – an idea that has bipartisan support, at least outside of Washington.

Some of what’s broken has to do with the way Congress does its business these days.  A simple majority is no longer enough to get anything – even routine business – passed through the Senate.  Neither party has been blameless in these tactics.  Now both parties should put an end to it.  For starters, I ask the Senate to pass a rule that all judicial and public service nominations receive a simple up or down vote within 90 days.

The executive branch also needs to change.  Too often, it’s inefficient, outdated and remote.  That’s why I’ve asked this Congress to grant me the authority to consolidate the federal bureaucracy so that our Government is leaner, quicker, and more responsive to the needs of the American people.

Finally, none of these reforms can happen unless we also lower the temperature in this town.  We need to end the notion that the two parties must be locked in a perpetual campaign of mutual destruction; that politics is about clinging to rigid ideologies instead of building consensus around common sense ideas.

I’m a Democrat.  But I believe what Republican Abraham Lincoln believed:  That Government should do for people only what they cannot do better by themselves, and no more.  That’s why my education reform offers more competition, and more control for schools and States.  That’s why we’re getting rid of regulations that don’t work.  That’s why our health care law relies on a reformed private market, not a Government program.

On the other hand, even my Republican friends who complain the most about Government spending have supported federally-financed roads, and clean energy projects, and federal offices for the folks back home.

The point is, we should all want a smarter, more effective Government.  And while we may not be able to bridge our biggest philosophical differences this year, we can make real progress.  With or without this Congress, I will keep taking actions that help the economy grow.  But I can do a whole lot more with your help.  Because when we act together, there is nothing the United States of America can’t achieve.

That is the lesson we’ve learned from our actions abroad over the last few years.

Ending the Iraq war has allowed us to strike decisive blows against our enemies.  From Pakistan to Yemen, the al Qaeda operatives who remain are scrambling, knowing that they can’t escape the reach of the United States of America.

From this position of strength, we’ve begun to wind down the war in Afghanistan.  Ten thousand of our troops have come home.  Twenty-three thousand more will leave by the end of this summer. This transition to Afghan lead will continue, and we will build an enduring partnership with Afghanistan, so that it is never again a source of attacks against America.

As the tide of war recedes, a wave of change has washed across the Middle East and North Africa, from Tunis to Cairo; from Sana’a to Tripoli.  A year ago, Qadhafi was one of the world’s longest-serving dictators – a murderer with American blood on his hands.  Today, he is gone.  And in Syria, I have no doubt that the Assad regime will soon discover that the forces of change can’t be reversed, and that human dignity can’t be denied.

How this incredible transformation will end remains uncertain.  But we have a huge stake in the outcome.  And while it is ultimately up to the people of the region to decide their fate, we will advocate for those values that have served our own country so well.  We will stand against violence and intimidation. We will stand for the rights and dignity of all human beings – men and women; Christians, Muslims, and Jews.  We will support policies that lead to strong and stable democracies and open markets, because tyranny is no match for liberty.

And we will safeguard America’s own security against those who threaten our citizens, our friends, and our interests.  Look at Iran.  Through the power of our diplomacy, a world that was once divided about how to deal with Iran’s nuclear program now stands as one.  The regime is more isolated than ever before; its leaders are faced with crippling sanctions, and as long as they shirk their responsibilities, this pressure will not relent.  Let there be no doubt:  America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal.  But a peaceful resolution of this issue is still possible, and far better, and if Iran changes course and meets its obligations, it can rejoin the community of nations.

The renewal of American leadership can be felt across the globe.  Our oldest alliances in Europe and Asia are stronger than ever.  Our ties to the Americas are deeper.  Our iron-clad commitment to Israel’s security has meant the closest military cooperation between our two countries in history.  We’ve made it clear that America is a Pacific power, and a new beginning in Burma has lit a new hope. From the coalitions we’ve built to secure nuclear materials, to the missions we’ve led against hunger and disease; from the blows we’ve dealt to our enemies; to the enduring power of our moral example, America is back.

Anyone who tells you otherwise, anyone who tells you that America is in decline or that our influence has waned, doesn’t know what they’re talking about.  That’s not the message we get from leaders around the world, all of whom are eager to work with us.  That’s not how people feel from Tokyo to Berlin; from Cape Town to Rio; where opinions of America are higher than they’ve been in years.  Yes, the world is changing; no, we can’t control every event.  But America remains the one indispensable nation in world affairs – and as long as I’m President, I intend to keep it that way.

That’s why, working with our military leaders, I have proposed a new defense strategy that ensures we maintain the finest military in the world, while saving nearly half a trillion dollars in our budget.  To stay one step ahead of our adversaries, I have already sent this Congress legislation that will secure our country from the growing danger of cyber-threats.

Above all, our freedom endures because of the men and women in uniform who defend it.  As they come home, we must serve them as well as they served us.  That includes giving them the care and benefits they have earned – which is why we’ve increased annual VA spending every year I’ve been President.  And it means enlisting our veterans in the work of rebuilding our Nation.

With the bipartisan support of this Congress, we are providing new tax credits to companies that hire vets.  Michelle and Jill Biden have worked with American businesses to secure a pledge of 135,000 jobs for veterans and their families.  And tonight, I’m proposing a Veterans Job Corps that will help our communities hire veterans as cops and firefighters, so that America is as strong as those who defend her.

Which brings me back to where I began.  Those of us who’ve been sent here to serve can learn from the service of our troops.  When you put on that uniform, it doesn’t matter if you’re black or white; Asian or Latino; conservative or liberal; rich or poor; gay or straight.  When you’re marching into battle, you look out for the person next to you, or the mission fails.  When you’re in the thick of the fight, you rise or fall as one unit, serving one Nation, leaving no one behind.

One of my proudest possessions is the flag that the SEAL Team took with them on the mission to get bin Laden.  On it are each of their names.  Some may be Democrats.  Some may be Republicans.  But that doesn’t matter.  Just like it didn’t matter that day in the Situation Room, when I sat next to Bob Gates – a man who was George Bush’s defense secretary; and Hillary Clinton, a woman who ran against me for president.

All that mattered that day was the mission.  No one thought about politics.  No one thought about themselves.  One of the young men involved in the raid later told me that he didn’t deserve credit for the mission.  It only succeeded, he said, because every single member of that unit did their job – the pilot who landed the helicopter that spun out of control; the translator who kept others from entering the compound; the troops who separated the women and children from the fight; the SEALs who charged up the stairs.  More than that, the mission only succeeded because every member of that unit trusted each other – because you can’t charge up those stairs, into darkness and danger, unless you know that there’s someone behind you, watching your back.

So it is with America.  Each time I look at that flag, I’m reminded that our destiny is stitched together like those fifty stars and those thirteen stripes.  No one built this country on their own.  This Nation is great because we built it together.  This Nation is great because we worked as a team.  This Nation is great because we get each other’s backs.  And if we hold fast to that truth, in this moment of trial, there is no challenge too great; no mission too hard.  As long as we’re joined in common purpose, as long as we maintain our common resolve, our journey moves forward, our future is hopeful, and the state of our Union will always be strong.

Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America.

Share

O discurso de Obama, parte 1

25 de janeiro de 2012 0

Começou o discurso apostando no que seu governo tem de ponto forte: o retorno das tropas do Iraque, o fim da guerra e a morte de Osama bin Laden:

- Pela primeira vez, Bin Laden não é uma ameaça a este país - afirmou.

Em seguida, Obama apontou seu discurso na direção da economia, o centro de seu pronunciamento.

- Em 2008, o castelo de cartas caiu - afirmou.

O presidente lembrou que, na crise, seis meses antes de ele assumir a Casa Branca, os EUA perderam 4 milhões de empregos. E lembrou os 3 milhões de postos de trabalho criados nos últimos meses:

- Eu lutarei contra qualquer coisa que tente fazer voltar essa crise econômica que nos colocou nessa posição.


Share

Um discurso para marcar a diferença em relação aos republicanos

24 de janeiro de 2012 0

Dentro de 30 minutos, o presidente Barack Obama tomará a palavra no Congresso americano para o famoso e tradicional discurso sobre o Estado da União. Dos pronunciamentos que fez desde venceu a eleição - depois do discurso da vitória, no Grant Park de Chicago, em 2008, e o da posse, em 20 de janeiro de 2009 - este talvez seja o mais importante.

Dependendo do que disser, poderá ser seu último discurso sobre o Estado da União como presidente dos EUA - ou garantir sua reeleição com 10 meses de antecedência.

Em 1996, Bill Clinton encontrava-se em situação semelhante a de Obama. Sua popularidade estava em baixa, ele pretendia a reeleição, mas enfrentava índices de rejeição consideráveis. Após seu discurso no Congresso, naquele janeiro, viu sua popularidade subir cerca de 20 pontos percentuais.

Há pouco, a Casa Branca, como é costume, divulgou trechos do pronunciamento. Como se esperava, a economia será a chave de sua fala. Obama dirá que oferecer oportunidades não são valores democratas ou republicanos, mas americanos.

- Não se pode esquecer que milhões de americanos que trabalham duro e respeitam as leis merecem um governo e um sistema financeiro que o façam o mesmo - dirá Obama.

O presidente adotará uma postura que marcará sua diferença em relação aos pré-candidatos republicanos. Enquanto os rivais defendem em grande parte os eleitores da classe alta, Obama tem se apresentado como o representante da classe média - que é quem de fato decidirá a eleição. No dia em que Mitt Romney publicou sua declaração de imposto de renda, segundo a qual pagou bem menos impostos do que a grande maioria dos americanos, essa postura faz toda a diferença pró-Obama

- É hora de aplicar as mesmas regras tanto para os de cima quanto para os debaixo? nem planos de resgate nem dádivas, nem escapatórias. Um EUA que perdure necessita que cada um assuma suas responsabilidades - dirá.

Veja outros trechos da fala do presidente, divulgados antecipadamente aqui

Share

Estado da União: os bastidores

24 de janeiro de 2012 0

O discurso sobre o Estado da União é o mais importante pronunciamento do presidente dos EUA. A cada ano, em janeiro, o comandante-em-chefe da nação presta contas ao Congresso - acompanhado por milhares de pessoas pela TV. Mas raramente é possível acompanhar como é a preparação do discurso. Seguindo a característica de sua gestão - e da campanha vitoriosa de 2008 - sempre conectada à internet, Obama divulgou imagens de como foi confeccionado o texto.

Share

Começou mal

21 de janeiro de 2012 0

Desde a caótica eleição de 2000, em que Al Gore venceu, mas quem chegou à Casa Branca foi George W. Bush, pouca coisa mudou no confuso processo eleitoral americano. Naquele ano, com a disputa em nível nacional acirrada, quem ganhasse na Flórida seria eleito. Bush estava à frente de Gore no Estado por 1.784 votos. Mas, com a recontagem, a diferença caía hora a hora. Cédulas perdidas e votos mal perfurados sim, o país mais moderno do mundo usava em 2000 cédulas em que os eleitores furavam o papel ao lado do nome do candidato tornaram-se o terror de fiscais, candidatos e jornalistas. Foram 35 dias de batalha judicial, e acabou dando Bush.

As urnas eletrônicas só foram disseminadas nos EUA em 2008. Mesmo assim, na Califórnia do Vale do Silício, a maioria dos eleitores ainda usou papel e caneta para votar.

O que aconteceu em Iowa, há três semanas, é um mau sinal. Nos caucuses, os filiados ao partido reúnem-se em igrejas, ginásios e escolas. A cédula é um pedaço de papel em branco, em que o eleitor escreve o nome do candidato e o deposita em urnas que podem ser caixas de sapato ou recipientes plásticos. No dia da disputa, Mitt Romney foi declarado vencedor por oito votos. Mas percebeu-se que os resultados de oito dos 1.774 locais de votação tinham sumido. Na recontagem, quem levou foi Rick Santorum, por 34 votos. Para um país que luta a cada quatro anos contra o fantasma de 2000, foi um péssimo começo.

Share

Obama canta, pinta e borda

20 de janeiro de 2012 0

O presidente americano, Barack Obama, revelou seu talento oculto como cantor ao entoar o clássico de Al Green "Let's Stay Together" durante uma reunião para arrecadar fundos em Nova York.

_ Há cinco anos que trabalho para o presidente Obama e até ontem (quinta-feira) à noite ignorava o fato de que ele sabia cantar _ disse o diretor de comunicação da Casa Branca, Dan Pfeiffer, por meio de sua conta no Twitter.

A interpretação musical do presidente ocorreu no teatro Apollo, uma sala de espetáculos do bairro do Harlem famosa por ter acolhido uma série de shows memoráveis do grande ícone do soul, James Brown, em 1962. O também lendário Al Green estava na plateia quando Obama subiu ao palco e fez uma homenagem a ele ao cantar as primeiras estrofes de sua música "Let's Stay Together", de 1972. "I´m so in love with you" (estou tão apaixonado por você), cantou o presidente com uma voz aveludada que provocou aplausos no público.

_ Esses garotos não achavam que eu faria isso _ disse Obama, que parecia referir-se a seus colaboradores que estavam ao lado do palco.

Veja o vídeo abaixo:

Share

“Não aceitamos chantagem”

15 de janeiro de 2012 1



Rosa Baez



Há quatro anos, Rosa Baez deixou mais de três décadas de trabalho na Biblioteca Nacional de Cuba para se dedicar à internet. Virou blogueira oficial do governo cubano – a antítese do que faz, por exemplo, Yoani Sánchez, a famosa autora do blog Generación Y, que, desde Cuba, denuncia as limitações impostas pelo governo dos irmãos Castro. Rosa faz o contrário: por meio do blog La Polilla Cubana, entre outros que mantém, ela defende o governo que tomou o poder na Revolução de 1959. Desde sua casa, ela também monitora o que é publicado na imprensa mundial sobre a ilha e, quando não concorda, contesta – como fez com a entrevista de Yoani publicada em Zero Hora na edição de 7 de janeiro. Em conversa por telefone a Zero Hora, ela expõe a sua versão sobre Cuba:

Zero Hora – O que a senhora contesta nos argumentos de Yoani?

Rosa Baez – Nem jornais na internet recebem a ajuda financeira que o blog de Yoani tem. Ela recebe ajuda de grupos privados e do governo americano. Não há a ideia de “pobre mulher que não tem acesso a outros países”. Ela tem todos os recursos. Eu não tenho câmera de vídeo, gravador. Questiono a banalidade de tudo o que expressa. Não há um post em seu blog que seja uma crítica contundente à Revolução. Ela está enganando a comunidade internacional. Os posts são ridículos, banais... Fala sobre falta de bananas em Cuba, por exemplo. E, com isso, ganha prêmios internacionais, com milhares de euros.

ZH – Dê um exemplo do que não corresponde à realidade.

Rosa – Ela trata de temas banais. Um dia disse que no Malecón não há guarda-sóis, outra dia disse que não há bananas em Cuba. Ora, havia passado três ciclones, como haveria bananas nas lavouras? Estamos preocupados em trabalhar por uma sociedade melhor, com os poucos recursos, e vem essa gente com palhaçadas. Aqui não há uma dissidência real.

ZH – A senhora trabalha como jornalista?

Rosa – Sou bibliotecária, mas, por problemas de saúde, tive de parar com meu trabalho na Biblioteca Nacional e passei a trabalhar em um centro de imprensa. Não temos cobertura internacional. Um artigo que Yoani escreve é reproduzido em 200 jornais. No entanto, notícias a favor de Cuba não recebem cobertura. O Unicef reconhece Cuba pela baixo índice de mortalidade infantil. Tu procuras na imprensa e não encontras. No Brasil ninguém sabe que em Cuba há baixa mortalidade infantil. Mas sabem que não há guarda-sóis, porque Yoani disse que não há guarda-sóis. Não é justo.

ZH – Quando a senhora criou o blog?

Rosa – Tenho vários blogs. Por que vários? Há muitos sites que hospedam blogs que, de uma hora para outra, podem tirar a informação do ar. Aconteceu comigo e com um amigo. Tínhamos um blog, e, de repente, o site que o hospedava disse que estávamos mandando spams ou que o blog tinha conteúdo inapropriado. E o fecharam. ZH – Quem o fechou? Rosa – No meu caso, Google fechou. Blogger, a ferramenta do Google, fechou meu blog por seis meses, embora eu escrevesse constantemente, protestando, dizendo que não estava transmitindo spams. Então, tens de ter alguns blogs alternativos.

ZH – A senhora quer dizer que há censura por parte de empresas?

Rosa – Exatamente. Cuba não tem a infraestrutura necessária para quem quer ter internet. Como é por satélite, a rede é mais cara e mais lenta. No caso de postarmos um vídeo no YouTube ou fazermos download, é comum desistirmos porque demora muito. Dei uma entrevista a um jornal espanhol, em vídeo, e nunca pude ver toda a entrevista. Estou tentando subir um vídeo no YouTube e já fazem 72 horas.

ZH – A senhora não acha que a culpa é da situação de Cuba, do regime fechado que comanda o país?

Rosa – Esse é o problema. Inclusive pessoas que vivem no país pensam isso. Dizem: “Não me dão acesso à internet”. Como vão dar acesso? Não vais poder abrir uma página. Não há infraestrutura.

ZH – Yoani pediu ajuda à presidente Dilma Rousseff para sair de Cuba, já que o governo não permite. A senhora gostaria de sair do país?

Rosa – Por razões de trabalho, tive a oportunidade de sair, fui à Argentina. Se Yoani quer tanto sair, porque regressou, se estava no Exterior? Regressou porque lhe ofereceram dinheiro.

ZH – O que a senhora diz a quem trata Cuba como uma ditadura?

Rosa – Se tu tivesses recursos limitados e precisasse escolher entre dá-los aos teus profissionais, pesquisadores, jornalistas ou a quem está denegrindo o teu projeto, a quem tu darias? Em primeiro lugar, aos teus. Quando a Unesco reconheceu a Palestina como membro, o que os EUA fizeram? Tiraram o apoio financeiro. Por que temos de obedecer a essa chantagem? Não vamos aceitar. Convidamos todos a vir conversar em pé de igualdade. Há pouco, o governo libertou grande quantidade de prisioneiros políticos.

Share

As últimas imagens do jornalista morto na Síria

12 de janeiro de 2012 0

As últimas imagens do cinegrafista da TV France 2 Gilles Jacquier, morto ontem na Síria. Hoje o governo sírio lamentou a morte. Outras oito pessoas, todas sírias, morreram no ataque, uma explosão que pegou de surpresa jornalistas que trabalhavam na área. Experiente repórter de guerra, com passagens por Kosovo, Afeganistão e os países da Primavera Árabe, Gilles é o primeiro correspondente ocidental morto na atual crise síria. Veja reportagem da rede CNN com as cenas (fortes).


Share

Mitt Romney leva New Hampshire

11 de janeiro de 2012 0

Avassalador! O ex-governador de Massachusetts levou mais um Estado americano na disputa republicana. Depois de vencer em Iowa, Mitt Romney conquista New Hampshire, como se esperava, com grande vantagem, segundo prospectos da rede CNN. Ele é o primeiro republicano a ganhar nos dois Estados sem estar na presidência. Praticamente imbatível na corrida pela vaga para a disputa com Obama na eleição de novembro.

Romney também lidera na Carolina do Sul e na Flórida, que fazem suas prévias nos dias 21 e 31. Com a consolidação da candidatura de Romney, crescem também os ataques pessoais, como os que marcaram os debates do fim de semana. Entre os apoiadores de Romney  a esperança é de selar ainda este mês sua indicação como o ungido do partido - algo bem incomum na política americana.

Share

Cai a primeira candidatura entre os republicanos

04 de janeiro de 2012 0

Não se surpreenda, mas as prévias americanas mal começaram e já fizeram a primeira vítima: Michele Bachmann, deputada que foi a grande decepção da disputa no Estado de Iowa, acaba de jogar a toalha. Ela ficou com apenas 5% dos votos. Michele era a grande aposta do movimento Tea Party, o grupo ultraconservador do Partido Republicano que tem como sua estrela Sarah Palin - que, aliás, teria muito mais chance, se fosse pré-candidata.

É a segunda grande baixa no partido - a primeira depois do início das prévias. Herman Cain, apontado como favorito até se ser acusado por quatro mulheres de abuso sexual. O sobe e desce da campanha é assim mesmo, normal nesse período de definições internas. A própria vitória de Mitt Romney em Iowa (por oito votos) deve ser vista com cautela, uma vez que a disputa está só começando.

Durante a madrugada, algunas analistas americanos especularam que Rick Perry também abandonaria o barco. Mas a saída não se confirmou. Pelo menos por enquanto.

Share

Iowa dá largada a uma longa jornada

03 de janeiro de 2012 1

O Estado de Iowa, no Meio-Oeste dos EUA, dá a largada para uma longa jornada que vai culminar no final de agosto na convenção nacional do Partido Republicano, uma grande celebração em Tampa, na Flórida. Até lá, quando for ungido o político capaz de desafiar Barack Obama, candidato à reeleição, muitos políticos cairão no meio do caminho. O complexo sistema eleitoral americano é estranho a nós, brasileiros. Em rápidas palavras, divide-se em duas etapas - na primeira, que começou hoje, os dois principais partidos - Democrata e Republicano - escolhem seus candidatos. Como Obama vai disputar a reeleição, desta vez apenas os republicanos escolherão o nome do seu competidor. São oito, entre eles Mitt Romney, ex-governador de Massachusetts, a quem aposto como o provável anti-Obama ao final desta jornada. É o único até agora capaz de enfrentar o presidente democrata.

O processo de escolha se dá por primárias internas - votação normal, em que os filiados ao partido se reúnem e votam em um dos políticos. Ou caucuses - uma espécie de assembleia nas comunidades, igrejas, bairros, associações, nas quais as pessoas se reúnem e, por aclamação, escolhem quem será o candidato. No caso de Iowa, é caucus.

Assim, aquele que for o vencedor nas primárias ou caucuses leva um número x de delegados (que varia de acordo com a população de cada Estado) para a convenção nacional. Aquele que tiver maior número de delegados na convenção nacional, vence - é ungido o candidato do partido.

Um pouco difícil de entender, né? Mas é assim que os americanos fazem há 222 anos. Escolhidos os candidatos, eles entram em uma segunda fase, que vou deixar para explicar mais adiante.

Ou seja, é um longo processo, que culmina em seguida na eleição, que este ano será em 6 de novembro. Como eu disse lá no início, está só começando. E mesmo antes da primeira disputa interna, já vimos um show de gafes entre os republicanos - um candidato dizendo que o povo palestino foi inventado (Newt Gingrich), outro afirmando que a China não tem armas nucleares (Herman Cain, que saiu da disputa) e um terceiro, Rick Perry, sugrindo que o Texas se separe dos EUA.

Se depender do que vimos até agora, o principal adversário de Obama será mesmo "apenas" a economia americana - e mundial.

Em tempo, em Iowa, em 2008, Obama venceu Hillary Clinton (que depois viria a ser sua secretária de Estado) na disputa interna democrata. Mike Huckabee ganhou de John McCain, que venceria na disputa final entre os republicanos. Mas perderia para Obama no confronto de novembro.



Share

O mito Kim pelos norte-coreanos

01 de janeiro de 2012 1

Na semana passada, numa dessas frestas da cortina de ferro norte-coreana, vazou (ou foi deixado vazar) uma frase de um soldado na TV estatal:

- Como pode o céu não chorar a morte de Kim Jong-il - ele perguntava-se.

Meio presidente, meio pai de todos, Kim era uma figura quase sobrenatural para os norte-coreanos, uma imagem criada e lapidada pela onipresença das placas, outdoors e propaganda oficial. Como exemplo de como a população vislumbrava seu ditador o jornal El País publicou neste fim de semana algumas ilustrações que circulam por Pyongyang. Veja aqui


Share

Alteração da realidade

29 de dezembro de 2011 1

A História é pródiga em imagens adulteradas, antes mesmo dos recursos tecnológicos. Com o avanço dos programas de edição de imagens, como o Photoshop, porém, tornou-se muito mais fácil forjar as cenas. Em regimes ditatoriais, a prática é usada para expurgar inimigos antigos ou para tentar maquiar a realidade. Depois que Stalin subiu ao poder na URSS,  foi sistemática a ação para eliminar parte da História. Uma das mais famosas está abaixo: a original mostra Lenin e Trotsky, frente ao Bolshoi em Moscou. Após o expurgo de Trotsky, a primeira versão seria retocada, o que eliminaria sua figura das fotografias.

Outro exemplo, bem mais recente, ocorreu com o regime do Irã, que alterou no computador a imagem do lançamento de mísseis - incluindo um a mais, que tinha falhado.

Em outro exemplo, a realidade não foi alterado por governos, mas por um jornal judaico ultra-ortodoxo chamado Der Tzitung, editado pela comunidade hassídica em Nova York. A publicação apagou a secretrária de Estado americana, Hillary Clinton, da famosa imagem na Casa Branca minutos após a morte de Osama bin Laden. O jornal não permite a publicação de fotos de mulheres em suas páginas - uma outra funcionária também foi apagada (veja abaixo).

Em tempo, Zero Hora não altera fotos eletronicamente.


Share